Modern Aspects of Screening for Early-Onset Preeclampsia

FULL TEXT:

Abstract

Preeclampsia (PE) remains a significant medical and social issue worldwide, affecting 2–8% of pregnant women. It has long been, and continues to be, a potentially fatal pregnancy complication. PE or eclampsia accounts for 10–15% of all maternal deaths, resulting in at least 70,000 deaths globally each year. Early-onset PE (developing before 34 weeks of gestation) is a primary factor contributing to both maternal and perinatal mortality. To this day, PE is considered an urgent, potentially critical condition in obstetrics. The long-term consequences of PE are unpredictable, as it is currently impossible to objectively assess the extent of functional and organic impairment (damage) to the organs of the mother, fetus, or newborn. Unfortunately, the etiology and pathogenesis of PE are not yet fully understood, which complicates efforts to predict the condition and implement effective preventive measures. The purpose of this scientific review is to analyze existing literature on a screening method for the detection and prevention of preeclampsia (PE). This approach—which integrates maternal characteristics and medical history, the uterine artery pulsatility index (PI), mean arterial pressure (MAP), and maternal serum levels of pregnancy-associated plasma protein-A (PAPP-A) and placental growth factor (PlGF) at 11–13 weeks of gestation—can identify a high proportion of pregnancies at risk for early-onset PE. Consequently, the most promising prognostic models incorporate a combination of tests that assess various aspects of maternal susceptibility and placentation, such as maternal risk factors, mean arterial pressure, uterine artery Doppler ultrasound, and biomarkers. There is sufficient evidence regarding certain combinations of markers to allow for a reasonable assessment of PE risk. Prospective studies are required to evaluate risk prediction across diverse populations. Furthermore, it is necessary to assess the potential of novel biomarkers—identified through innovative research strategies—to determine whether they can enhance the predictive performance of existing models.

About the Authors

List of references

Торчинов А.М., Кузнецов В.М., Акуденко А.В., и др. Способ персонализированного прогнозирования развития преэклампсии на основе анамнестических, фенотипических и генотипических предикторов // Проблемы репродукции. ― 2018. ― №1. ― С. 87-91.

Инициатива по преэклампсии Международной федерации гинекологии и акушерства (FIGO): практическое руководство по скринингу в I триместре и профилактике заболевания (адаптированная версия на русском языке под редакцией З.С. Ходжаевой, Е.Л. Яроцкой, И.И. Баранова) // Акушерство и гинекология: новости мнения, обучение. 2019. Т. 7, № 4. С. 32–60

Brown M.A., Magee L.A., Kenny L.C., Karumanchi S.A., McCarthy F.P., Saito S., et al. The hypertensive disorders of pregnancy: ISSHP classification, diagnosis & management recommendations for international practice. Pregnancy Hypertens. 2018; 13: 291-310.

Nissaisorakarn P., Sharif S., Jim B. Hypertension in Pregnancy: Defining Blood Pressure Goals and the Value of Biomarkers for Preeclampsia. Curr Cardiol Rep. 2016; 18(12): 131.

Ndoni E., Hoxhallari R., Bimbashi A. Evaluation of Maternal Complications in Severe Preeclampsia in a University Hospital in Tirana // Maced J. Med. Sci. ― 2016. ― №4 (1). ― Р. 102-106. doi: 10.3889/oamjms.2016.025.

Villa P.M., Marttinen P., Gillberg J., et al. Cluster analysis to estimate the risk of preeclampsia in the high-risk Prediction and Prevention of Preeclampsia and Intrauterine Growth Restriction (PREDO) study // PLoS One. ― 2017. ― №12 (3). ― Р. e0174399.

Poon L.C., Shennan A., Hyett J.A., Kapur A., Hadar E., Divakar H., et al. The International Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics (FIGO) initiative on pre-eclampsia: A pragmatic guide for first-trimester screening and prevention. Int J Gynecol Obstet. 2019; 145(S1): 1-33.

Contro, E. Uterine artery Doppler longitudinal changes in pregnancies complicated with intrauterine growth restriction without preeclampsia / Contro E., Cha DH, De Maggio I et al.// Prenat Diagn. -2014. - Vol. 34 . - P. 115¬-120.

Caradeux J., Martinez-Portilla R.J., Peguero A., Sotiriadis A., Figueras F. Diagnostic performance of third-trimester ultrasound for the prediction of late-onset fetal growth restriction: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2019; 220(5): 449-459.e19.

Thilaganathan B. Pre-eclampsia and the cardiovascular-placental axis. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2018; 51(6): 714 – 7.

Jim B., Karumanchi S.A. Preeclampsia: Pathogenesis, Prevention, and Long-Term Complications. Semin Nephrol. 2017; 37(4): 386 – 97.

NICE guideline. Hypertension in Pregnancy: Diagnosis and Management. Am J Obs Gynecol. 2019; 77(1): S1 – s22.

WHO. Meeting to develop a global consensus on preconception care to reduce maternal and childhood mortality and morbidity. World Health Organization Headquarters, Geneva, 6—7 February 2012: meeting report. Accessed November 08, 2019. Available from: http://www.

Ghi, T., Dall’Asta, A., Valensise, H. (2018). Antenatal Care of Preeclampsia: From the Inverted Pyramid to the Arrow Model?. FETAL DIAGNOSIS AND THERAPY, 44(2), 81-84 [10.1159/000490047].

How to Cite

Modern Aspects of Screening for Early-Onset Preeclampsia. (2026). International Journal of Scientific Pediatrics, 5(5), 1478-1485. https://doi.org/10.56121/2181-2926-2026-5-5-1478-1485

Similar Articles

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.

Most read articles by the same author(s)


ISSN 2181-2926 (Online)