CARDIOPROTECTION IN ANESTHESIOLOGICAL SUPPORT FOR PEDIATRIC OPEN HEART SURGERY: CLINICAL CAPABILITIES OF SEVOFLURANE

FULL TEXT:

Abstract

Experimental studies have shown that volatile anesthetics can induce pharmacological preconditioning and reduce the degree of myocardial damage, however, clinical data in pediatric practice remain limited and contradictory. Objective. Compare the cardioprotective effects of sevofluron and total intravenous propofol anesthesia in children who underwent open-heart surgery using artificial blood circulation. Methods. A prospective one-centered study included 106 children aged 6 months to 5 years with congenital heart defects who underwent open-heart surgery with cardioplegic cardiac arrest. Patients were divided into two groups: sevofluran (n=53) and propofol (n=53). The primary endpoint was the maximum level of cardiospecific troponin T in the postoperative period. Secondary endpoints included the frequency of arrhythmias, indicators of hemodynamic stability, echocardiography data, the need for inotropic support, the duration of mechanical ventilation and stay in the intensive care unit. Results. In all observations, an increase in the level of cardiospecific troponin T after surgery was noted, however, its values were significantly lower in the sevofluran group at all stages of observation. After 3 hours, the level of cTnT was 1.2±0.3 ng/ml in the sevoflurane group and 1.9±0.4 ng/ml in the propofol group (p<0.05), after 8 hours-1.7±0.4 and 2.6±0.5 ng/ml respectively (p<0.01), after 12 hours-1.5±0.3 and 2.3±0.5 ng/ml (p<0.05), after 24 hours-1.1±0.2 and 1.8±0.3 ng/ml (p<0.05). Arrhythmias were registered in 11.3% of patients in the sevoflurane group and in 26.4% of patients in the propofol group (p<0.05). The need for inotropic support was lower when using sevoflurane (15.1% versus 32.1%, p<0.05). The time of artificial lung ventilation (9.2±3.1 versus 13.6±4.4 hours, p<0.01) and the duration of stay in the ICU (36±10 versus 52±14 hours, p<0.05) were significantly shorter in the sevoflurane group. Echo-indicators indicated a faster restoration of myocardial systolic and diastolic function in patients receiving sevoflurane. Conclusion. The use of sevoflurane in open-heart surgeries in children is associated with more pronounced cardioprotection compared to propofol, which is manifested by a lower degree of myocardial damage, more stable hemodynamics, and faster functional recovery of the heart in the early postoperative period.

About the Authors

List of references

Ivanov V.A., Trekova N.A., Yevseev Ye.P., Nikityuk T.G., Ivanova L.N., Fedulova S.V., Aydamirov Ya.A., Soloveva S.E., Sidorenko Ya.V. Xirurgicheskie i anesteziologicheskie aspekti radikalnoy korreksii kriticheskogo aortalnogo stenoza. Kardiologiya i serdechno-sosudistaya xirurgiya. 2019;12(4):266-272. Ivanov V.A., Trekova N.A., Yevseyev Ye.P., Nikityuk T.G., Ivanova L.N., Fedulova S.V., Aydamirov Ya.A., Soloveva S.Ye., Sidorenko Ya.V. Xirurgicheskiye i anesteziologicheskiye aspekti radikalnoy korreksii kriticheskogo aortalnogo stenoza. Kardiologiya i serdechno-sosudistaya xirurgiya. 2019;12(4):266-272. https://doi.org/10.17116/kardio201912041266.

Kozlov I.A., Klipa T.V., and Antonov I.O. «Deksmedetomidin kak kardioprotektor v kardioxirurgii (obzor)» Obщaya reanimatologiya, vol. 13, no. 4, 2017, pp. 46-63. Kozlov I.A., Klipa T.V., and Antonov I.O. «Deksmedetomidin kak kardioprotektor v kardioxirurgii (obzor)» Obщaya reanimatologiya, vol. 13, no. 4, 2017, pp. 46-63.

Ahmed N, Mehmood A, Linardi D, Sadiq S, Tessari M, Meo SA, Rehman R, Hajjar WM, Muhammad N, Iqbal MP, Gilani AU, Faggian G, Rungatscher A. Cardioprotective Effects of Sphingosine-1-Phosphate Receptor Immunomodulator FTY720 in a Clinically Relevant Model of Cardioplegic Arrest and Cardiopulmonary Bypass. Front Pharmacol. 2019 Jul 18;10:802. doi: 10.3389/fphar.2019.00802. PMID: 31379576; PMCID: PMC6656862.

Chennakeshavallu GN, Gadhinglajkar S, Sreedhar R, Babu S, Sankar S, Dash PK. Comparison of effects of sevoflurane versus propofol on left ventricular longitudinal global and regional strain in patients undergoing on-pump coronary artery bypass grafting. Ann Card Anaesth. 2022 Apr-Jun;25(2):188-195. doi: 10.4103/aca.aca_240_20. PMID: 35417966; PMCID: PMC9244250.

Chiari P, Fellahi JL. Myocardial protection in cardiac surgery: a comprehensive review of current therapies and future cardioprotective strategies. Front Med (Lausanne). 2024 Jun 19;11:1424188. doi: 10.3389/fmed.2024.1424188. PMID: 38962735; PMCID: PMC11220133.

Fu T, Jia X, Tang C, Yu D, Zhou H, Wang X, Liu S, Wu K. Anesthetic-mediated cardioprotection: from molecular mechanisms to clinical translation challenges. Front Physiol. 2025 Sep 17;16:1688142. doi: 10.3389/fphys.2025.1688142. PMID: 41041269; PMCID: PMC12484132.

Kuppuswamy B, Davis K, Sahajanandan R, Ponniah M. A randomized controlled trial comparing the myocardial protective effects of isoflurane with propofol in patients undergoing elective coronary artery bypass surgery on cardiopulmonary bypass, assessed by changes in N-terminal brain natriuretic peptide. Ann Card Anaesth. 2018 Jan-Mar;21(1):34-40. doi: 10.4103/aca.ACA_96_17. PMID: 29336389; PMCID: PMC5791484.

Nederlof R, Weber NC, Juffermans NP, de Mol BA, Hollmann MW, Preckel B, Zuurbier CJ. A randomized trial of remote ischemic preconditioning and control treatment for cardioprotection in sevoflurane-anesthetized CABG patients. BMC Anesthesiol. 2017 Mar 29;17(1):51. doi: 10.1186/s12871-017-0330-6. PMID: 28356068; PMCID: PMC5372281.

Sless RT, Allen G, Hayward NE, Fahy G. Characterization of troponin I levels post synchronized direct current cardioversion of atrial arrhythmias in patients with and without cardiomyopathy. J Interv Card Electrophysiol. 2021 Mar;60(2):329-335. doi: 10.1007/s10840-020-00814-x. Epub 2020 Jul 3. PMID: 32621213.

How to Cite

Toxirov Ф., Toshboev Ш., & Kodirov М. (2026). CARDIOPROTECTION IN ANESTHESIOLOGICAL SUPPORT FOR PEDIATRIC OPEN HEART SURGERY: CLINICAL CAPABILITIES OF SEVOFLURANE. International Journal of Scientific Pediatrics, 5(1), 1192–1199. https://doi.org/10.56121/2181-2926-2026-5-1-1192-1199
Views: 0